Ohio Channel Banner
 

Case No. 2011-1473 State of Ohio v. Emmanuel Hampton

 
 
 

Collections

Supreme Court of Ohio

Description

Is Court's Acquittal Order Based on Improper Venue a 'Final Verdict' That Bars Further Prosecution of Defendant?

State of Ohio v. Emmanuel Hampton, Case no. 2011-1473
Tenth District Court of Appeals (Franklin County)

ISSUES:

After a criminal trial has begun, may the court grant a defense motion for an order of “acquittal” under Criminal Rule 29 when the sole basis for that order is a finding that the court conducting the trial is not a proper venue for prosecution of the charges against the defendant?
If a trial court may grant an order of acquittal under Criminal Ruled 29 based solely on lack of venue, is that acquittal a “final verdict” that invokes the defendant’s right against double jeopardy and bars the state from... [ More ]
- Click marker to go directly to that point in the video -
Steven Taylor for the state
Jonathan Tyack for Emmanuel Hampton
Summation: Steven Taylor for the state
 
 
Set In Point : sec Set Out Point : sec
Width : px Height : px
Code :
 Facebook Embed : To embed this video into your Facebook page, copy and paste the above URL into Facebook's 'Link' box in its 'Share' options.
Please Note : End points and dimensions are not recognized by Facebook.
Set In Point : sec Set Out Point : sec
URL :
 
Date : 05-22-2012     View : 2,200 Views     Duration : 00:37:06     Size : 168.5 MB    
Download File : 360p