Ohio Channel Banner
 

Case No. 2012-0169 Stammco, LLC, d.b.a. The Pop Shop, et al. v. United Telephone Company of Ohio, d.b.a. United Telephone Co., et al.

 
 
 

Collections

Supreme Court of Ohio

Description

Did Trial Court Err by Considering Merit Issues in Ruling That ‘Phone Cramming’ Lawsuit Cannot Be Pursued as Class Action?

Suit Alleges Phone Company Negligent In Verifying Charges Added to Customers’ Bills

Stammco, LLC, d.b.a. The Pop Shop, et al. v. United Telephone Company of Ohio, d.b.a. United Telephone Co., et al., Case no. 2012-0169
Sixth District Court of Appeals (Fulton County)

ISSUE: In denying class action certification of a civil lawsuit brought by multiple customers against a phone company, did the trial court err by basing its decision on an evaluation of the merits of claims asserted by the plaintiffs, rather than on the compliance or noncompliance of the proposed class definition with the criteria for cla... [ More ]

Tags

Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court Of Ohio

Related Links

Case Information For Case #2012-0169
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2012-0169
 
 
Set In Point : sec Set Out Point : sec
Width : px Height : px
Code :
 Facebook Embed : To embed this video into your Facebook page, copy and paste the above URL into Facebook's 'Link' box in its 'Share' options.
Please Note : End points and dimensions are not recognized by Facebook.
Set In Point : sec Set Out Point : sec
URL :
 
Date : 02-06-2013     View : 9,059 Views     Duration : 00:36:33     Size : 166.1 MB