Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2008-1837/2009-0314 In the Matter of the Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. In the Matter of the Application of The East Ohio Gas Company d.b.a. Dominion East Ohio Expand
 
 
September 16, 2009
09-16-2009
1,169 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Did Sufficient Evidence Support PUCO Adoption of 'Levelized' Natural Gas Transmission Rate Model?

In the Matter of the Application of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. In the Matter of the Application of The East Ohio Gas Company d.b.a. Dominion East Ohio, Case nos. 2008-1837 and 2009-0314

Public Utilities Commission of Ohio

ISSUE: In 2008, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) issued separate orders authorizing a change in the rate structures used by Duke Energy of Ohio and by East Ohio Gas Company, d.b.a. Dominion East Ohio, to calculate the portion of their customers' monthly natural gas bills that covers transmission service. The city of Cleveland and several consumer groups, including the state Office of Consumers' Counsel, Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy and the Natural Resources Defense Counsel, have appealed the commission's orders to the Supreme Court. The appellants ask the Court to rule that the PUCO acted unreasonably and unlawfully in adopting the new transmission rate structures, and to order the commission to rescind those rates and develop new ones.
_090314
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2008-1837
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2008-1837
Case Information For Case #2009-0314
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2009-0314
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2022 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.