Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2008-2424 State of Ohio v. Thonex Williams Expand
 
 
October 20, 2009
10-20-2009
1,652 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Does Ohio Law Allowing Commitment of Mentally Ill Criminal Defendants Violate Their Due Process Rights?

State of Ohio v. Thonex Williams, Case no. 2008-2424

2nd District Court of Appeals (MontgomeryCounty)

ISSUE: Under Ohio R.C. 2945.39, when a mentally ill person has been indicted for a violent felony but found incompetent to stand trial, and a common pleas court finds that after one year of treatment there is no substantial probability the defendant can be restored to competence in the foreseeable future, the trial court may involuntarily commit the accused to a psychiatric hospital if the state shows by clear and convincing evidence: 1) that the accused falls within the legal definition of a mentally ill person subject to hospitalization; and 2) that the accused committed the violent felony with which he was charged. In this case, a Dayton man who was indicted on a violent felony count, found incompetent to stand trial and involuntarily committed to a mental hospital under R.C. 2945.39 asks the Supreme Court to affirm a court of appeals ruling that the statutory commitment process violated his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the law.
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2008-2424
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2008-2424
Opinion Summary For Case #2008-2424
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2022 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.