Is Denial of Motion to Bifurcate Trial of Suit Seeking Both Compensatory, Punitive Damages a 'Final Order'?

When Motion Refers to 2005 Tort Reform Provision

John T. Flynn et al. v. Fairview Village Retirement etc. et al., Case no. 2010-1881

8th District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County)

ISSUE: When the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages from a defendant, and the defendant files a motion citing R.C. 2315.21(B) and asking the trial court to bifurcate the plaintiff's claims, is the court's denial of the motion to bifurcate without stating a reason a "final order" subject to immediate review by a court of appeals under R.C. 2505.02(B)(6) and/or R.C. 2505.02(B)(4)?