Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
 
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2011-0052 Artisan Mechanical, Inc. v. James Michael Beiser et al. Expand
 
 
October 4, 2011
10-04-2011
2,420 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
When Settlement Agreement Disputed, Must Court Hold Hearing Before Either Enforcing or Refusing to Enforce?

12th District Court of Appeals (Butler County)

ISSUE: When terms of a settlement agreement are disputed in a court action, or a court is asked to rule on whether a settlement agreement existed between the parties, must the court conduct an evidentiary hearing before entering judgment in the case regardless of whether its decision enforces or denies enforcement of the purported agreement?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2011-0052
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2011-0052
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
Markers Transcript
 
00:00:26 Timothy G. Pepper for Artisan Mechanical Inc.
00:17:39 Anthony G. Covatta for James Beiser and Chris Lay
00:31:49 Summation: Timothy G. Pepper for Artisan Mechanical Inc.
There is no transcript for this video.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2023 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.