Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2011-0926 Sugarcreek Township v. City of Centerville (Mp3) Expand
 
 
April 3, 2012
04-03-2012
615 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download File
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Description
Does Law Entitling Township to Taxes from Annexed Land Bar City from Granting Post-Annexation 'TIF' Deferral?

Where City Seeks Tax Increment Financing to Encourage Development

Sugarcreek Township v. City of Centerville, Case no. 2011-0926

Second District Court of Appeals (Greene County)

ISSUE: Does a provision of state law that entitles townships to continue receiving property tax revenue from land that has been annexed to a municipality through an "expedited type-2" annexation prevent the annexing municipality from later adopting municipal tax-incentive financing (TIF) that temporarily defers city and township taxes payable on the annexed property to pay for public improvements that support economic development of the land?
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2022 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.