The Ohio Channel

Link

Embed Code

Available Versions

To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.

Collections

Supreme Court of Ohio

Description

Must Court Consider Content of Plaintiff's Written Pleadings As Well As Opening Statement Before Granting Directed Verdict?

When Defendant Moves For Directed Verdict After Plaintiff's Opening Statement

Sandy Parrish, Administrator, et al. v. Michael E. Jones et al., Case no. 2012-0623

Fourth District Court of Appeals (Ross County)

ISSUE: When ruling on a defendant's motion for a directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff's opening statement, is a trial court required to consider not only the content of the opening statement, but also the allegations contained in the plaintiff's written pleadings?

Tags

Ohio Government Judicial Branch Supreme Court of Ohio

Markers Transcript

00:00:55	Kevin Popham for Family Medicine of Chillicothe and Christopher Skocik
00:17:48	Jonathan Stoudt for Sandy Parrish
00:33:22	Summation: Kevin Popham for Family Medicine of Chillicothe and Christopher Skocik

There is no transcript for this video.

Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions