Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2012-2156 Christopher Richmond v. State of Ohio Expand
 
 
November 19, 2013
11-19-2013
2,044 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
When Neither Party Requests a Presentence Report at Trial, May an Appeals Court Reverse the Sentence Based on the Absence of That Report?

Christopher Richmond v. State of Ohio, Case no. 2012-2156

Eighth District Court of Appeals (Cuyahoga County)

ISSUE: Is it appropriate, without the most exigent circumstances, for an appellate court to disturb a trial court's sentence of community control sanctions in a felony case when neither party requests a presentence investigation report?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2012-2156
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2012-2156
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of Ohio
 
Markers Transcript
 
00:00:26 John Martin for Christopher Richmond
00:19:41 Allan Regas for the state
00:34:05 Summation: John Martin for Christopher Richmond
There is no transcript for this video.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2023 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.