Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2013-0544 State of Ohio v. Amanda Straley Expand
 
 
February 5, 2014
02-05-2014
2,337 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
To Prove Tampering With Evidence, Must Discarded Evidence Be Directly Related to the Investigation?

State of Ohio v. Amanda Straley, Case no. 2013-0544

Second District Court of Appeals (Clark County)

ISSUE: Does a tampering-with-evidence conviction require proof that the defendant discarded the record, document, or thing to impair its availability as evidence in an investigation?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2013-0544
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2013-0544
Opinion Summary For Case #2013-0544
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of OhioPolice StopTraffic StopEvidenceTampering with EvidenceInvestigationDrug Possession
 
Markers Transcript
 
00:00:22 Christopher Kinsler for the state
00:15:36 Valerie Kunze for Amanda Straley
00:22:06 Summation: Christopher Kinsler for the state
There is no transcript for this video.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2022 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.