Is Defendant's Request for Data from Breath Alcohol Machine a Challenge to His Specific Test or General Attack on the Instrument's Reliability?
City of Cincinnati v. Daniel Ilg, Case no. 2013-1102
First District Court of Appeals (Hamilton County)
ISSUE: Did a defendant arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol who took a breath alcohol test demand production of information about the breath-testing instrument that is in violation of the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Vega (1984)?