Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 88,272,262
Total Views 88,272,262
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Court News: Troubleshooting Cellphone Technology in Court Cases Expand
 
 
December 6, 2019
12-06-2019
99 Views
Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 480p VideoDownload 1080p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Court News Ohio
 
Description
Troubleshooting Cellphone Technology in Court Cases
By Csaba Sukosd | December 6, 2019

Smartphones are arguably the biggest technological evolution over the past generation. That change is particularly noticeable in court cases.

The subject of cellphone forensics and cellular location evidence was the opening topic at the Ohio Common Pleas Judges Association's annual winter conference in Dublin.

Since the development of text messaging and global positioning systems (GPS) on cellphones, both have become more prevalent as evidence in cases as a way to prove or disprove a claim.

"It is now common for us, especially in criminal cases, to see this kind of evidence introduced to establish locations of defendants and victims," said Lucas County Common Pleas Judge Ian English, who added that half of his criminal cases this year involved cellphone evidence.

Given the increased accuracy in which cellphone signals can place a person's whereabouts at certain times, law enforcement is utilizing advanced technology as part of its investigative methods to justify warrants presented to judges. Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge John Russo described it as a routine approach that's becoming more common at the state and local levels.

"If we're able to substantiate that it's an individual that might be under investigation, it's led us to homes. It's led to cars where we're then able to put a tracker on a car because of that continual use of illegal activity," said Judge Russo.

While things like texts and GPS data are meant to provide clarity for the courts, there's newer technology that can deceive those records. "Spoofing" is a way for someone to doctor dialed phone numbers. There are also apps that can alter messages, such as who sent them, or what was communicated.

"You oftentimes get defendants who are alleging that they didn't send the text, or they didn't make that call," said Stark County Common Pleas Judge Taryn Heath.

During his hourlong presentation, forensics expert Larry Daniel explained how the science has changed throughout the years, including the development of new tools used to counter bogus clues. It's part of an ever-changing digital world where innovation is inevitable. As some use it for personal gain, others will counter with efforts to seek the truth. 

"I think you're going to see a continual process, like you always do. As technology gets better, the investigating technology will get better in response to that," said Judge Russo.
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2025 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.