Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2014-0292 Jeffrey B. Saturday and Karen R. Saturday v. City of Cleveland Board of Review and Nassim Lynch, Cleveland Tax Administrator Expand
 
 
January 14, 2015
01-14-2015
1,841 Views
Share Download Buy
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
May Cleveland Tax Nonresident Professional Athlete Who Was Never in City?

Jeffrey B. Saturday and Karen R. Saturday v. City of Cleveland Board of Review and Nassim Lynch, Cleveland Tax Administrator, Case no. 2014-0292

Ohio Board of Tax Appeals

ISSUES:

Is Cleveland's taxation of nonresident employees who perform no work or services in the city contrary to the city's ordinances and Ohio law?

Does Cleveland's law taxing nonresident employees who perform no work or services in the city violate the U.S. Constitution's due process and commerce clauses?

Is using the games-played method to determine a nonresident professional athlete's taxable income contrary to Ohio law?

Does Cleveland's allocation of a nonresident professional athlete's income using the games-played method violate the due process clause in the U.S. Constitution?

Does Cleveland's allocation of a nonresident professional athlete's income based on the games-played method violate the U.S. Constitution's commerce clause?

Under R.C. 718.011(B), are professional athletes treated differently than similarly situated taxpayers in violation of the Ohio Constitution and the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2014-0292
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2014-0292
Opinion Summary For Case #2014-0292
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2022 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.