Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2014-0978 Boone Coleman Construction, Inc. v. Village of Piketon, Ohio Expand
 
 
June 9, 2015
06-09-2015
2,228 Views
Share Download Buy
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 720p Video
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Did Appellate Court Decision Essentially Rewrite Construction Contract's Application of Liquidated-Damages Clause?

Village of Piketon, Ohio v. Boone Coleman Construction, Inc., Case No. 2014-0978

Fourth District Court of Appeals (Pike)

ISSUES:

- Must a court analyze a liquidated-damages provision of a construction contract prospectively, based on the per-diem amount of the liquidated damages at the time the contract was executed? Or must the court analyze such a contract retrospectively, based on the total, actual liquidated damages that accrue?

- Are liquidated damages a penalty because no proof of actual damages is required to enforce a contract's liquidated-damages clause?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2014-0978
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2014-0978
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2023 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.