Archive
 
Video Library
Store
 
Online StoreShopping Cart
About
 
Program DirectoryBroadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAbout the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsAffiliatesJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
ARCHIVESTOREABOUT
 
Video Library
 
 
Online Store Shopping Cart
 
 
Program Directory Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Affiliates Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Case No. 2013-0109 State of Ohio v. Thomas C. White Expand
 
 
February 5, 2014
02-05-2014
2,620 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 360p VideoDownload 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Was a Shooting by an On-Duty Police Officer Reasonable, and Are On-Duty Police Officers Exempt from a Statute That Enhances the Penalty for an Offense for Using a Firearm?

State of Ohio v. Thomas C. White, Case no. 2013-0109

Sixth District Court of Appeals (Lucas County)

ISSUES:

Is the firearm specification in R.C. 2941.145 constitutional when a law enforcement officer is found guilty of committing a crime in which he used his firearm while on duty?

Does Ohio law permit pre-trial dismissals of criminal charges based on the immunity that police officers sometimes have in civil cases?

Does a trial court abuse its discretion or commit plain error if it instructs the jury to determine whether a police officer's use of deadly force was objectively reasonable or whether the officer had reasonable grounds to believe that he or a fellow officer was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm?

Does a trial court need to give a jury an instruction explaining "mistaken belief" when the jury is told to determine whether a person acted "knowingly," as defined by statute?

Does a trial court abuse its discretion when it excludes testimony about the exact violation and degree of offense the suspect being pursued by the police is accused of committing?
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2013-0109
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2013-0109
Opinion Summary For Case #2013-0109
 
Tags
Ohio GovernmentJudicial BranchSupreme Court of OhioFirearm SpecificationPolice Officer ImmunityAbuse of DiscretionPlain ErrorJury InstructionFelonious AssaultFourth AmendmentReasonableness StandardPolice Stop
 
Markers Transcript
 
00:00:34 Evy Jarrett for the state
00:23:55 Peter Galyardt for Thomas White
00:38:28 Christina Corl, amicus curiae The National Fraternal Order of Police on behalf of Thomas White
00:47:53 Summation: Evy Jarrett for the state
There is no transcript for this video.
Note : Transcripts are compiled from uncorrected captions
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2023 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.