Archive
 
Video Library
Broadcast
 
Broadcast ScheduleChannel LocatorAffiliatesDaily Streaming Schedule
About
 
About the Ohio ChannelFrequently Asked QuestionsContact UsJob OpportunitiesSite RequirementsMedia Information
 
 
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
A SERVICE OF OHIO'S PUBLIC BROADCASTING STATIONS
ARCHIVEBROADCASTABOUT
Total Views 72,628,435
Total Views 72,628,435
Broadcast Schedule Channel Locator Affiliates Daily Streaming Schedule
 
 
About The Ohio Channel Frequently Asked Questions Contact Us Job Opportunities Site Requirements Media Information
 
 
 
Supreme Court of Ohio - Case No. 2020-1533 Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Bruner Expand
 
 
May 11, 2021
05-11-2021
337 Views
Audio Only Share Download
 
Start At    sec      End At    sec
 
Link
Embed Code
Available Versions
Download 480p VideoDownload 720p VideoDownload 1080p VideoDownload Audio (mp3)
 
 
To download a video: right-click on the version you'd like to save, then choose "Save Link As..." and save to your desktop.
 
Collections
Supreme Court of Ohio
 
Description
Cleveland Attorney Accused of Incompetent Representation and Dishonesty
Ohio State Bar Association v. Harvey B. Bruner, Case No. 2020-1533
Cuyahoga County

Harvey Bruner, a criminal defense attorney in Cleveland, is facing a proposed two-year suspension for failing to provide competent legal representation, failing to explain to clients what legal services he would provide for his fee, and not keeping proper records of his work.

The Ohio State Bar Association (OSBA), which investigated the allegations, and Bruner had agreed that he violated several rules governing the conduct of Ohio attorneys and to dismiss other alleged rule violations. Bruner and the OSBA settled on a recommended suspension of two years with one year stayed and restitution for two clients. However, the panel of the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct that heard the disciplinary case reinstituted a dismissed rule violation related to two clients, finding that Bruner's conduct involved fraud, dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation.

The board adopted the panel's recommendations, but Bruner objects to them. Given the attorney's objections, the Ohio Supreme Court will hear the case during oral arguments, which will be held by videoconference because of the COVID-19 health crisis. The Court's session will be livestreamed.
Related Links
Case Information For Case #2020-1533
Oral Argument Preview For Case #2020-1533
 
 
 
 
Copyright Disclaimer Terms of Use Contact Us Support
 
 
© 2023 The Ohio Channel / ideastream.
All Rights Reserved.